What Did Richmond Need to Learn About Harry Armstrong in His Second AFL Season?
Updated: Aug 30
Harry Armstrong’s first AFL season gave Richmond an early look at his contested marking, pack work and willingness to use his body as an 18-year-old key forward.
His finishing and the consistency required against mature AFL defenders still needed further evidence.
What should year two have been designed to reveal: goals, marking, repeat contests, leading patterns or his ability to combine with Richmond’s other tall forwards?
How should the club separate normal young-key-forward inconsistency from evidence about the role Armstrong could eventually own?
What happens when the rest of the evidence is added — and what would Richmond need to prove next?
Not a member yet?
RTSSG.com: Richmond News By Richmond People For Richmond People!
Comments