Why Did Richmond Wait Two Years for Ray Stokes — Then Lose Him at His Best?

Richmond secured the agreement of a gifted Tasmanian footballer in 1944. It did not see him in a senior Tigers guernsey until 1946. And when that player eventually established himself as one of the club's most respected midfielders, he left after a season in which he played every match. Ray Stokes poses a historical problem far bigger than a routine list of games and goals. How could Richmond make a sound recruiting decision, benefit from the footballer it found, and still be unable to turn that individual success into a lasting advantage?

Jack Dyer and secretary Maurie Fleming travelled to Tasmania to pursue Stokes, but his work in a protected industry during the Second World War prevented an immediate move. That distinction matters: the club's early judgment and the player's eventual arrival happened in different years because national circumstances stood between them. In our full Members investigation, we examine what Richmond could and could not control when it recruited across Bass Strait, and why those two lost years belong at the centre of this story.

What did Richmond know before it could bring him across Bass Strait?

Stokes was not a completely untested local prospect. He had represented Tasmania at the 1938 National Schoolboys Carnival, before playing senior football with Burnie in the changed conditions of wartime competition. Richmond eventually gave him thirteen senior games in 1946 and used him in the 1947 finals. What did those early opportunities prove about the decision to recruit him? Our full feature dissects the evidence from his first Richmond seasons and separates the club's recognition of genuine ability from its later inability to build a stronger team around it.

How valuable was a centreman in a struggling Richmond side?

The numbers provide a clue without telling the whole story. Stokes played ninety-three games, kicked twenty-three goals and collected thirty-one Brownlow votes while Richmond struggled to reproduce its 1943 premiership success. He was primarily a centreman and winger, not a footballer whose value should be measured by his goal tally. In the full investigation, we examine what the Brownlow recognition tells us about an accomplished individual playing in a side that could not consistently turn talent into September appearances.

His younger brother Jervis also came to Richmond from Burnie, with Ray's injury opening the door to Jervis's debut. The family connection is striking, but it raises a sharper question than whether two brothers were fortunate enough to play League football. Did Richmond understand the Tasmanian talent available to it better than it understood what was necessary to convert that talent into sustained team success? In our Members feature, we trace the brothers' different careers and the wider recruiting decisions their experiences illuminate.

Why did Richmond lose him when he was still performing?

Then came 1951. Stokes played all eighteen Richmond matches and was recognised among the club's leading performers, yet returned to Tasmania rather than continuing in the VFL. The available accounts do not establish a single definitive personal motive, and speculation should not be mistaken for an explanation. But the football consequence was plain: Richmond lost an experienced, highly regarded midfielder while trying to escape an increasingly difficult period. Our full feature examines what the club lost, what cannot fairly be blamed on his departure, and what his decision reveals about the limits of interstate recruiting.

Stokes's career did not fade away when he crossed Bass Strait again. He captain-coached Burnie to the 1954 premiership, won the Wander Medal, represented Tasmania, led NWFU representative sides, wrote about regional football and played first-class cricket into his forties. Even his relationship with Tom Hafey endured beyond his League career. In our full Members investigation, we follow that second sporting life and ask whether Richmond's historical memory has understated the quality of a player whose greatest leadership achievements came after he went home.

Read the full Members investigation: Why Did Richmond Wait Two Years for Ray Stokes — Then Lose Him at His Best?

Not a member yet? Join RTSSG to read our full investigations.

RTSSG.com: the place to go after the first headline.

Richmond news by Richmond people, for Richmond people.